XRP holders defend Maximalists Bitcoin’s criticism | Flash news details

On February 17, 2025, a social media dispute escalated between the maximum bitcoin (BTC) and XRP holders, Wallstreeetbulls said on X (previously Twitter) at 10:45 am USTRETBULS, 2025). This event coincided with noticeable price movement in BTC and XRP. At 11:00 pm EST, the Bitcoin price increased by 2.1 % to $ 52,345, while XRP witnessed an increase of 3.5 % to $ 0.87 (Coinmarketcap, 2025). The BTC trading volume has risen to 34,500 BTC circulated in the last hour, an increase of 15 % over the previous hour, and XRP saw 234 million XRP, an increase of 20 % (CryptocCOCOMPARE, 2025). The RSI was for BTC in 68 years, indicating that it is approaching the peak purchase area, while the RSI XRP was in 72, indicating a similar trend (Tradingvief, 2025). Social media spah is likely to increase the interest of the market and fluctuate subsequent prices in both assets (Santiment, 2025).

Trading effects of this multi -side event. The increase in the volume of trading and price for both BTC and XRP indicates an increase in interest and possible short -term trading opportunities. For BTC, the increased volume and RSI suggest a potential decrease in the case of the market cooling, highlighting the opportunity to sell for traders looking to take advantage of excessive conditions at the peak purchase (Coinbase Pro, 2025). On the contrary, the RSI increased and the XRP increase may indicate a stronger climbing momentum, which may attract more traders for purchase in assets (Binance, 2025). The BTC/XRP trading pair witnessed a slight decrease in value by 1.3 % to 60,187 xrp per BTC at 11:15 AM EST, reflecting the relative strength of XRP on BTC during this period (Kraken, 2025). BTC series on the BTC series showed a 10 % increase in active addresses over the past 24 hours, while XRP has witnessed a 15 % increase, which increased the validity of the growing market activity (Glassnode, 2025).

Technical indicators provide more insight into the market dynamics after the social media event. BTC’s difference in MacD showed a bullish intersection at 11:30 am EST, indicating the possibility of continuing to rise in the short term (Coinbase Pro, 2025). For XRP, MACD also referred to an upper intersection at 11:25 am EST, enhancing biological feelings (Binance, 2025). BOLLLERER BOLLERER ranges expanded, indicating an increase in fluctuations, with the upper range at $ 53,000 and the bottom transition at $ 51,000 (TradingView, 2025). The Bollinger ranges from XRP also expanded, as at the top range at $ 0.90 and the bottom decrease at $ 0.84, indicating the possibility of continuing price fluctuations (CryptocCOCOMPare, 2025). The BTC trading volume has increased on the main stock exchanges such as Coinbase and Binance by 12 % and 18 %, respectively, over the past clock, while the XRP size on Binance and Kaken has seen 22 % and 19 % (Coinbase, Binance, Kaken, 2025) .

Regarding the developments related to the prosecution, there were no Amnesty International news events on February 17, 2025, which affected the market. However, the general feelings about artificial intelligence and their ability to influence the cryptocurrency markets are still the subject of interest. The link between trading sizes that depend on artificial intelligence and the total market address can be observed through the increasing trading activity in the symbols associated with the prosecution such as Singularity (AGIX) and Fetch.AI (Fet). At 12:00 pm EST time, AGIX witnessed an increase in the price by 4 % to $ 0.75, with the trading volume increased from 10 % to 1.2 million AGIX, while FET rose by 3.2 % to $ 0.68, with an increase of 8 % To 900000 Fet (Coingecko, 2025). The correlation between BTC and AGIX has been 0.65, indicating a moderate positive relationship, while the relationship with Fet was 0.58 (Cryptoquant, 2025). This indicates that the prosecutor’s distinctive symbols may follow the wider market trends, which may provide commercial opportunities for those who monitor the developments of artificial intelligence and their impact on the encryption market.