Will Nations fight Bitcoin with a competitive network of prisoner?

In a discussion about KS, Jason Loweri discussed the sustainability and future of networks in several abuses (RPov) – especially whether the nations can try to create competitive work systems. The conversation was launched by investor rabbit hole (@ ribbitholeinvst) aimed at the name, astronautical engineer, a major in the American space force and the author of the “Billing Strategic Significance of Bitcoin for American National Security.

Can the National State fight Bitcoin with its own network of prisoners?

The investor of the rabbit holes enrolled in the fuelable, “Do you see the future in which other evidence of the working network for other applications are created?” The tense responded to the referencing issues previously received from the Bale Calce of Science & Technology Police.

He listed This although it cannot predict the future of absolute certainty, it will be dominant RP’s network in the same way in which TCP / IP became a global data transfer standard: “This was one of the questions I received from the office For the science and technology of the White House. (…) My intuition is that one dominant network to replace (RPOV) will be re-exchanged as the primary standard – How much TCP / IP has become a universal data transfer protocol (…) in RPOV, network size directly on security. (…) This consolidation of all RPOV applications in one network of RPOV (…) is a strategic need. “

He elaborated as RP’s security scales with the compulsory forces and energy expenditures, creates “increasing cycles” that naturally encourages participants to cross to the largest and safest network. Nanemari applied to what calls “mutually secured preservation”, where even the state at the national states (eg NATO and Brics) would effectively become “Frenemia” on the same RP’s network. According to its assessment: “Attack costs either side increases to so much to become” Frennial “, each strengthens the safety of others in the same network.”

The attitude at lower levels is strongly leaning towards Bitcoin as the dominant RPOV protocol. Although he does not signify “Bitcoin Makimalist”, it is clear that Bitcoin de facto global standard is standard due to market forces and network effects.

Thomas Youth, General Partner in Rumjog Enterprises, a further examined thesis and asking for individual ownership of BTC in the world in which national countries treat network as “standard”, will it be practically privately held BTC? … Specifically, interested rent of the nationality “Rent” Private held BTC to impose or created diversification or will simply want to possess their own BTC? “

The Palany replied, “I am a subscriber in belief that if Bitcoin becomes a natural unit, its purchasing power increases because humanity is growing up-to-date-unnecessary, even. The Bitcoin itself is a yield.”

He then divided the perspective of warning about the promises of yields in the future in which governments could adopt executive orders for confiscation of BTC detention. According to the pastries: “If I were an unferni president or nation, I would lure people to give up my self-administration over my BTC, I notice the promise of yield … Then, with a simple executive order, Nedig Nedig, CoinAnd Mstr’s Bitcoin … I don’t own Mstr. Mstr’s Bitcoin is the future president of Honeipot … when it is next EO6102 Inevitably coming, it will be widely supported. “

Another user attacked whether the sovereign entities could create their own networks – for example, Sidechains or DriveChains reputation in the main bitcoin network – under their sovereign control. Nanemari replied with opposing installments and Proof of role (POS) In terms of centralization: “If the goal is sovereign control over the network, then the POS is a far better design than it is captive … Nation (or any entity) can easily survive the tokens, distribute them and implement voting -Capped POS system .. . This structure would ensure that control remains centralized … while continues to maintain (false) the occurrence of a decentralized system. “

He admitted that the nation could create a RP’s network with centralized administrative control, but this approach is more complex and more efficiently with direct evidence for achieving centralized management: “POS offers a more direct and more practical way to achieve centralized control over the network Digital property without computer and energy intensive requests for war. “

The general subject of comments on the Paleera is that it is also a game-theoretical pressure – both among individuals and states on national favorites that favor consolidation around one, safest network of prisoners. He claims that Bitcoin’s pure scale and rooted position to give him almost insurmountable leadership. In the meantime, nations seeking control can be experimented with alternative protocols, but they eventually face the steep upheaval fighting against what has already accepted the “free and open market”.

At the time of pressing, BTC traded $ 95,937.

Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com