“We are in the war, and our values ​​are in question” – Veteran calls Etherum cultural drift threat

What happens when a long-standing Etherum Insider calls the ecosystem “Religion” What is the lost touch with reality? Critical view of Solemanin’s thread – and why did he hit the nerve.

Etherum is called again “

17. April, Ameen Soleimani announced a detailed thread in K who sharply criticized what he sees as Etherum’s (El) Growth of a squad from practical problems.

Comments Soleimanija framed in response to a post-oriented value of the Etherum Foundation of the researchers of Justin Drake, which approved and shared co-founder Vitalik Baterin.

In his posts, Soleimani challenged what he described as Etherum is reliance on abstract ideals and aspirating messages, claiming that these narrative often obscure the actual challenges faced by the network.

He expressed concern that culture around Etherum risk becomes too comfortable with unclear slogans to detriment of responsibility and grounded problem solving.

Soleimani is not new in Ethereum, nor speaks from foreign. The most famous is as the Creator Molochdao, decentralized funding of collectives in 2019. years to support Etherum infrastructure.

Molochdao also distributed grants for exploring Etherum 2.0 and contributed to resource coordination during the network transition on Proving the roles.

His participation in Etherum dates back to back. He co-founder Spankchain, adult platform with adult content built on Ethereum, investigating cases of use in direct cryptological payments and censorship resilience.

He also supported Rai, decentralized, non-oven Stablecoin, which developed a reflective of the laboratory and participated in public hearings around Tornado CashProtocol focused on the privacy currently located in legal supervision and in the United States and Europe.

Let us examine the basic arguments of SoleMeni set and estimates that they are concerned reflect deeper tensions within the Etherum ecosystem.

StableCoins on Ethereum

One of the prominent issues set in Soleman’s post is a continuous addiction to Ethereum about centralized stablecoines.

While Etrereum is as a platform for decentralized finances, a large proportion of her daily activities continues to be done through the property issued by private companies.

From 18. April, Stephone’s like moorings (USDTT) and the USD of USD (USDC) Account for a significant part of Etherum liquidity and trading volume. Toward DefilesThe combined value of the USDST and USDC arranged via Etherem exceeds $ 100 billion.

These tokens serve as basic security in borrowed markets, key trade pairs on decentralized exchanges and settlement mechanisms in a wide range of flow protocols. Their widespread integration made them are on many applications built on Ethereum.

However, this dependency level brings different compromises. Both USDT and USDC issue companies operating in national regulatory regimes. Tether is managed by IFinek, while USDC betrays Circle and managed through the central consortium.

These issuers maintain reserves from fiat-denominated, publish regular certificates and possess the authority to release or blomarist’s wallet address.

Although such powers are saved, their existence introduces the form of opposite risk, which is uncomfortable with Etherum’s wider narrative decentralization.

At the level of the Etherum protocol remains open, incapable and resistant to censorship. But the most commonly used tools are relying on infrastructure that can be changed or limited by centralized actors.

This difference is important. He points out that decentralization in Ethereum is not distributed evenly in all layers, especially in the context of financial instruments that are subject to regulatory control for monitoring and issuers.

Political neutrality and policy engagement

Second concerns in Soleman’s post is an Etherum evolving relationship with political systems. While the protocol is often described as apolitical and neutral, recent events show that its spread ecosystem is increasingly communicating with legal frameworks and political discussions within the competencies.

This shift does not change Etherum’s basic design, which remains allowed and open. However, this reflects the growing need for engaging regulators, especially when the network supports more capital, users and applications.

Infrastructure related to Etherum – including validatory operators, guardian and development teams – often operate in national laws and are subject to local compliance requirements.

Many of these entities are based in jurisdictions with active execution regimes. Since April 2025. years, Ethernodes data It shows that in countries in countries like the United States, Germany and Singapore where more than half of all active eating nodes are in countries, where legal obligations related to crypts are well established.

The geographical distribution of these nodes gives Etherum global range, but also exposes it to different degrees of regulatory surveillance.

Meanwhile, at the Global Front, members of Etherum Foundation participated in the talks on politics with governments in Europe, Asia and Latin America.

Over the years, Vitališki Baterina held meetings with public officials in Montenegro and Argentina to investigate national approaches to crypto management.

Although these interactions remain informal, they propose intentional efforts to contribute to policy formation, without necessarily strengthening protocols in any political direction.

In functional conditions, this engagement is not unusual. As Etherum becomes built into real world finances and infrastructure, the need for legal clarity increases. Protocate developers, node operators and wallet providers often require stable regulatory environments to alleviate operational risks.

Meanwhile, policy makers are increasingly looking for technical entry to inform the emerging regulations. The result is a two-way exchange – the policy of the form of protocol insights and the development of protocols under the influence of the regulatory context.

Etherum remains decentralized in the basic layer and does not rely on state certificate for its technical work. However, individuals and subjects build within their ecosystem often work within the legal boundaries.

The result is not a full detachment, but conditional independence – one in which neutrality has been preserved at the level of protocol, even as an engagement with political systems on the edges.

When “permission without innovation” meets the law

SoleManina Nit also aims to ground the Etherum community for community “principle rooted in the idea that someone should be able to build without having to need approval.

Although this concept has crossed most early growth of Ethereum, Soleimani argues that its consequences become increasingly difficult to ignore.

One of the most prominent examples stated by Tornado Cash, Privacy Protocol launched through Autonomous Smart Contracts on Ethereum.

2022. The American Treasury Office for Control of Foreign Funds Sanctioned the protocol, claimed to make money laundering for criminal actors, including North Korea Lazarus Group.

Sanctions were accompanied by arrest. Roman Storm and Alexei Pertsev, two cash developers Tornado, were detained in the United States and the Netherlands.

The storm is now facing charges related In order to wash money laundering, violations of international sanctions and management of unlicensed cash services – charges that carry potential prison sentence of up to 45 years.

For Soleimani, the question is not only just a legal action, but also as to the community in that etherum community. Some defended developers, while others relied on the argument that “in speech” and therefore beyond the reach of legal systems.

Soleimani reviews this assumption as wrong. According to his opinion, relying on the neutrality of the Code to ignore developers of responsibility as financial technologies are regulated in practice.

It is especially critical of believing that developers do not need legal support. In his post, he points to legal teams and advocacy organizations submitted by Amicus Briefs in the Defense of Roman Storm.

These submissions claim that writing and arranging open code should be protected under free speech, and that creators of decentralized tools should not be responsible for third party abuse.

Although these positions have gained support in the parts of the crypt’s industry, they remain legally insecure.

This case has wider implications to the Etherum development model. The right to build remains intact at the technical level, but legal risks related to the privacy tools and cross-border transactions grow.

In terms of Soleimani, the innovation without a permit has been defended now requires more than idealism. Requires legal prediction, active engagement and more deeper understanding of risks coming with buildings in a regulated world.

Is the ETH required price?

Soleimani also sets concerns about reliance Ethereum at the price of ETE to maintain the network security. In his post, he recalculated earlier disagreement with the researcher Etherum Foundation of Justin Drake, which previously suggested that the Eth’s market price had not particularly important.

Soleimani returned back asking a direct question: If Eth should lose value, how would Etherum still provide their network?

This is a basic issue within the current Etherum architecture. Since the crossing of the network on proof of the role in 2022. years, Etherum no longer uses miners. Instead, it relies on the validors who enter ETH to confirm transactions and that the system manages operational.

The efficiency of this model depends on the amount of quality, which is set and market values ​​of the tookon itself.

If Eth’s price Falls is too low, rewards for sincere validation reduce, which is less attractive for participants.

At the same time, the price of the attack on the network becomes cheaper. This dynamic is weak and incentive to ensure network and deterrence from malicious activity.

From 18. April, ETH trades about $ 1,570, which reflects the decline over 52 percent of recent High. Toward data From Beaconcha.in, more than 34 million ETE is currently set, which is approximately 28 percent of the total bid.

The Soleimani argument is that the braking systems do not separate monetary value from safety. The price of ETE is not just a market metrics. It is the basic part of how the network remains resilient.

Can Etherum reconcile and move forward?

Soleimani closes its post with question that extends beyond any individual disagreement. Can Etherum, as a system and community recognize its internal contradictions and still find a way to move forward?

Despite strong criticism, he does not write down the network. Instead, he reflected in the last moments in which change happened. For example, early discussions around the importance of the arena price eventually led to the occurrence of “ultrasonic money”. It sees it as evidence that the community is capable of adjusting when it decides.

His hope is that similar shifts can happen again. Challenges faced with Etherom are today different in nature – they involve legal risk, coordination problems and questions about how power is distributed. These are not just technical issues. They require a wider view of how the protocol fits into the world around.

Does Etherum can reconcile these tensions depends on how they suit them. This includes a reality regarding the Facebook of the Risk, tools on dependence, and the systems it communicates with. It also means accepting that decentralization comes with compromises that must be managed, not ignored.