The race for Blockchain superiority

Ripple and ChainLink, one of the most popular Blockchain giants, compete for pressure on the energy corridors in the US administration to access and integrate their services.

The race for full domination of bureaucratic levels between Brad Garlinghyus and the escalation of the Sergey Nazarov series by President Donald Trump in the 2024 US presidential elections, and its ride on the wave of support from the encryption leaders.

Representatives of the two companies are now competing for dominance and the suit in decision -making regarding a clear regulatory framework for encryption. Therefore, Ripple and Chainlink follows different methods of influence.

For those who do not know about pressure, it is a work to influence government and legislative officials to support or oppose the decision of politics. It includes direct contacts with legislators, public campaigns and more. It is legal and is done by individuals, companies, non -profit organizations, advocacy groups and more.

Ripple has fought the Supreme Education Council in its legal battle since 2020 using traditional political tools, including direct pressure, employing former officials, and making major donations in the campaign. On the other hand, ChainLink chose a tourist path through the integration into traditional and decentralized financial infrastructure through giant financial partnerships and technical solutions that solve organizational issues.

The Trump administration’s report on the “friend of public encryption” explains a basic question about digital force: Does political pressure work better than becoming indispensable for the regulatory acceptance system?

The answer to this question cannot be provided in the diodes, especially in the constantly developed web3 world, which is witnessing tremendous growth as well as organizational challenges at the same time.

Ripple versus ChainLink: two paths, one goal

It is not necessary to involve Ripple and Chainlink in a direct race; Both have specific use cases and chose separate paths for the White House corridors. How long can the encryption industry expect a clear, brief and healthy regulatory framework that will rely heavily on how Chainlink and Ripple representatives play in the following months.

In this article, we will explain the various pressure campaigns implemented by Ripple and Chainlink, which can serve as an introduction to the main developments in the web3 sector in the United States

Ripple’s direct pressure approach

Ripple works through an aggressive political strategy that invests greatly to influence government decisions related to the XRP and Ledger XRP currency. Ripple dedicates about one million dollars annually to pressure activities from 2021 to 2023, and thus become prominent Political power Inside the industry.

The company maintains a defensive position because its lengthy legal dispute with the Supreme Education Council began in 2020. Ripple accelerated the organizational transformation strategy after July 2023, when a court ruled that XRP sales on public stock exchanges were not securities and focused on acquiring CFTC instead of SEC’s passage.

Also read: The rise and ascension of Brad Garlinghyus from Ripple

Examples of the multiple pressure strategy from Ripple:

Ripple $ 710,000 in Pressure activities In 2023, while the total encryption industry spent $ 20 million that year. Ripple maintained nine political ties in 2023 by employing former government officials, such as Republican Congress member Mike Conway, who used their relations in Washington.

He also served as the second largest contributor to Fairshake Super Pac, who raised $ 92.9 million to fund supportive candidates during the 2024 elections.

Ripple supports Lummis-GillBrand for responsible financial innovation and other invoices to re-classify many cryptocurrencies as commodities instead of securities.

Ripple adopts this direct strategy to achieve its current business requirements, which includes an organizational understanding of international payment solutions and the development of Rlusd Stablecoin. Ripple supports friendly candidates for encryption and judicial challenges to establish a space for its technologies in the traditional financial system.

ChainLink strategic integration approach

Oracle decentralization network ChainLink She chose a lower expensive financial investment strategy, but it is likely to be more effective on Blockchain. The company directs its efforts to become the basic infrastructure that supports the innovation of encryption with the traditional update of financing instead of spending pressure activities mostly.

ChainLink approach focuses on multiple factors

Strategic partnerships with swift fidelity international DTCC and EUROCLEAR Show Chainlink capacity to unify traditional financing with Blockchain technology.

The regulatory needs of transparency, data accuracy, compliance are processed through the interfering operating protocol through the chain (CCIP), the proof of the Por and the restoration of smart value, which are technical solutions from Chainlink.

ChainLink explains its importance for government financial innovation through its participation in initiatives such as the Drex CBDC project for the Central Bank of Brazil.

The co -founder of Chainlink, Sergey Nazarov, is actively participating in Washington, DC, according to the unjust reports that indicate that it affects encryption legislation.

Also read: “The encryption industry was unfairly targeted”: the founder of Chainlink Sergey Nazarov

ChainLink aims to become necessary for both the encryption markets and financial systems established by implementing them in the compatible Blockchar structures and developing them for regulatory solutions, which can lead to continuous control of regulatory standards.

Ripple Vs Chainlink: contradictory navigation philosophies

Ripple and ChainLink follows different strategies because they work at different levels of Blockchain market and face varying regulatory challenges.

Direct pressure activities are found from Ripple due to immediate work requirements. Ripple should receive urgent regulatory relief because it faces the SEC application and needs to verify the health of both XRP and RLUSD while working as a company. The company invests its financial resources to pressure the political campaigns to accelerate the favorable policy changes that support its business model.

Meanwhile, ChainLink faces direct organizational threats. The network works as an Oracle system instead of release of the encoded currency, allowing it to provide infrastructure for compatible Blockchain applications. Chainlink determines its effect through its technical capabilities to solve problems, which solve Blockchain regulatory issues about reliability and transparency.

Trump management worker

The 2025 presidential victory adds to the Trump administration a new layer to this political dynamic. Now, companies can discover new possibilities for progress in their business schedules due to the position of the new government supporting the kicks and the expected decline in supervising the SEC.

The positive classification of XRP by organizational bodies can become possible to ripple facing less aggressive enforcement procedures. The adoption of the potential management of the Blockchain financial system can accelerate the implementation of the SainLink Oracle Solutions in governmental institutions and organized organizations.

conclusion

Since the Blockchain industry acquires more prevailing adoption, companies such as Ripple and ChainLink have strengthened their approaches to government relations in industry in emerging technology sectors. Both adopt different strategies, but the goal is the same: growth and innovation. Now, the success of these different strategies is likely to rely on how to develop encryption regulation in the United States under the new administration.