The closed meeting may affect the SEC in the encrypted currency market Flash news details

On February 27, 2025, at 2:00 pm EST, the US Securities and Stock Exchange Committee (SEC) held a closed meeting with the agenda items that focus on resolving litigation claims and other issues related to exams and enforcement procedures (Source: Eleanortertt on Twitter, February 27, 2025). The expectation surrounding this meeting led to the immediate market reactions, especially in the encrypted currency sector. At 2:15 pm EST time, Bitcoin (BTC) saw a slight decrease of 0.5 %, trading at $ 48,320, while ETHEREUM (ETH) witnessed a 0.3 % marginal increase, and traded at $ 3,250 (Source: Coinmarketcap, 27 February, 2025, 2:15 pm). The market sensitivity to the regulatory news was clear, as BTC trading volumes increased by 10 % to 3.5 million BTC per hour for the advertisement, compared to an average of 3.2 million BTC per hour in the previous 24 hours (Source: Coingecko, February 27, 2025, 3:00 pm). Likewise, the ETH trading volume increased by 8 %, reaching 2.1 million ETHs in the same time frame (Source: Coingecko, February 27, 2025, 3:00 pm EST time). This increased activity indicates a cautious but interactive market, ready for possible organizational consequences that can affect the ongoing cases that involve encryption assets.

The effects of the SEC meeting for merchants were multi -faceted. The instant price movements of BTC and ETH reflected the market that expects potential organizational transformations. For example, at 2:30 pm EST time, BTC/ETH trading pair witnessed a slight transformation from 14.85 to 14.87, indicating a marginal preference for ETH (Source: Binance, February 27, 2025, 2:30 pm EST). The scales on the series highlighted the market reaction. The number of active bitcoin addresses increased by 5 % to 950,000 within the next hour of the advertisement, and the indication of increased interest and activity (Source: Glassnode, February 27, 2025, 3:00 pm EST). In addition, the MVRV ratio (the market value to the achieved value) of BTC, which measures the market vision of the value, increased from 2.1 to 2.2, indicating the presence of simple emerging feelings (Source: Glassnode, February 27, 2025, 3:00 pm East US time). These standards indicate that traders were actively controlling their positions in anticipation of organizational news that could affect the legal status of encrypted currencies.

From a technical perspective, many indicators presented an insight into the announcement of the market meeting after the SC. At 2:45 pm EST time, the RSI RSI index (RSI) for BTC was 55 years old, indicating the state of the neutral market, while RSI of ETH reached 58 years, tilted slightly towards the lands of seen (Source: Tradingview, February 27, 2025, 2:45 pm EST). BTC’s MacD spacing showed a bullish intersection at 2:50 pm EST, with the MacD line crossing over the signal line, indicating a potential upward momentum (Source: TradingView, 27 February 2025, 2:50 pm EST). On the contrary, MACD did not appear as a similar intersection, indicating more stable expectations but less upward (Source: TradingView, February 27, 2025, 2:50 pm EST time). Trading volumes of other encryption couples such as BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT have witnessed increases, with a 12 % BTC/USDT trading volume to 4.2 million BTC and ETH/USDT increases by 9 % to 2.3 million souls (Source: Binance, 27, 2025, 3:00 PM EST). These technical indicators and sized data confirm the market expectations and their willingness to respond to the organizational news, which provides traders with critical visions to make decisions.

In the context of developments in artificial intelligence, no direct news related to the SEC meeting was related. However, the broader feelings in the encryption market are often linked to progress in artificial intelligence technology. For example, the AI’s trading algorithms have increasingly affected the market dynamics. A recent study showed that trading sizes driven by artificial intelligence are the main encrypted currencies increased by 15 % in the past quarter, driven by improved predictive models (Source: Cryptoquant, 27 February 2025). While the SEC itself did not directly affect the symbols of artificial intelligence, the market’s general reaction to the organizational news can affect the AI’s trading strategies. Traders who use artificial intelligence tools may control their algorithms to calculate potential organizational results, affecting trading volumes and market morale. This interaction between organizational news and trade that depends on artificial intelligence highlights the complex dynamics in the cryptocurrency market, where traders must remain vigilant and adaptive to both organizational and technological transformations.