Solana has a “many shortcomings”, claims the founder of the Fonda Cripto

Nor was shared by KS, Justin Bons-Founders and the Cyber ​​Capital Investment, the Fund, which describes the oldest cryptocurrent fund in Europe – a pointed criticism of Solana Blockogin was determined. He indictment Solana suffering from a number of shortcomings, including repeated network failures, pressures for pressure requiring hardware and what is shown as a non-deterministic model that sacrifices reliability for speed.

Solana has shortcomings, but still leads

Bons have recognized that Solana showed improvements over time – especially in addressing failures – they still stressed that the blocks “should never go,” even in the experimental phases “.” Significant congestion events ” Errors and problems scheduling with the KUIC protocol, while highlighting that sandwich and Mev (maximum value of extractor) remains a “unresolved problem” throughout the industry.

The BONS described Solane’s hardware requirements as a particularly burdensome: “The biggest hardware cost is far from the EC! This costs thousands of dollars …” Although there are any additional compounds of this barrier, Bons recognized that it still maintains more than 1,400 Validator.

He criticized what he considers the “broken local fee market”, which led to a degraded user experience, but expressed optimism that these issues would be resolved this year. As for the solanen unentiministic design, Bons claimed to create “less than 1% chance for a liquid difficulty” but marked structural inefficiency and waste. He also questioned the permanent sponsorship of the Solan Foundation, noting that it is valuable during the initial Solana growth, “the time was supposed to be interrupted … Salt can stand now.”

Despite this, Bons clearly gave himself from critics to the “fan”, claim “,” Sol is allowed and enough Decentralized block… BTC & ETH cannot provide this service on the scale. That’s why Sol is eating his lunch and while wearing a cipherpunk torch. “

The remarks have been encouraged by the direct response of the programmer of Solana Community Joao Mendonca, which pointed out that Chickccain’s frequent search for performance sometimes leads to almost breaking challenges. Mendonca said, “Solana pushes every single border known to this industry … still has a 99.9% extension with more than a year without stopping block production.”

Believes that additional occasional “accidents” remain possible while the network does not exist Multiple software clients– Suitable, most of the roles work on one client – still claimed that Solana continued to develop. Mendonca also addressed the observed centralization, pointing out that high hardware requirements do not necessarily interfere with the customer’s ability to run the verification nodes.

According to him, node configuration can be removed to a more modest request for those who only have to accompany the chain, reducing barriers to wider participation. Noted that all major blocks use incentives similar to Solana’s funded sponsorship program to help increase the walidator networks, watching it Solana Foundation The Program of the Delegation (SFDP) has already rejected about 20% to about 12% of the total share.

Bons answered by underlined that, while the presence of multiple clients could really reduce the future time of the network, such a breakdown should not be forgiven. He also reiterated Skepticism about Solana’s unaternity approach, claiming that it leads to an “optimistic model instead of deterministic,” which believes that reduces the reliability of the transaction.

Mendonca repressed suggesting that the solanic design is “priority speed to the user, only how it should be,” and that stopping the system prevents potential issues, at least until more customers appear Attach, at least until more customers can provide network severance pay.

At the time of pressure, Sol is traded for $ 192.

Featured image from Shutterstock, graph with tradingview.com