Children’s proposal of the child Elona Male Tiffany Fong – and events that led to Him

Why did Elon’s musk reach Tiffany Fong that way – and what happened between them online before that message?
Private proposal, Public relegation
A new controversy involving Elone musk appeared on the 16th April, following a report To Wall Street Journal.
According to the report, the musk is in November 2024. sent a private message to the CRIPTO influence and journalist Tiffany Fong, asking if they would consider their child. At that time, the message was sent, the two of them never met in person.
Fong, 31, built a significant next with over 335,000 followers in X and 48,000 subscribers on youtube. It is known for its contents and interviews by focused crypts, including the coverage of the main scandals that include companies such as Celsius Network and FTK.
Musk, which owns x and leads Tesla And Spacek, previously expressed concern about the decline of global birth rate. There are at least 14 children with four women at the moment.
Journal Wall Street Journal described Musk’s message as part of the wider form. According to the report, he wants to have children with women who considers intelligent, potentially as part of his long-term view of maintaining humanity outside the country.
The Fong reportedly rejected the guard and refused. A few close friends were entrusted, including the conservative influences of Ashley St. Clair, saying she preferred a traditional nuclear family structure.
St. Clair later claimed to be alone to have a child with musk. After learning that Fong revealed a private message, Musk reportedly criticized due to the lack of discretion and the sky is on X.
This decision had a direct impact on Fong’s visibility and income. During the period when the musk communicated with his content, she earned over $ 20,000 in two weeks. After the accompanying, her engagement fell, which resulted in a distinctly drop in monthly income.
Events leading to polemics
Fong began to gain recognition in the crypton space through the coverage of a high profile decay. One of her early videos, called “Celsius Network: I lost $ 200,000,” he received several thousand views of Youtube and attracted early attention to her channel.
Her profile continued to grow after her conducted Interviews with FTX I found Bankman-Fried while at home arrest. These conversations, published public, further amplified its reach in the community.
Men’s engagement with Fong content on X began during this period of growing visibility. In October 2023. Fong published a tense exchange with the mother of Fried Bankman, Barbara fried, outside the courtroom.
Musk responded directly, defended Fong and criticizing the fried academic positions. His response marked the beginning of regular public interactions between the two, which contributed to the growing audiences of Fong on the platform.
Musk followed at X in mid 2024. years and began to deal with his posts often. They included a comment on CRIPT’s development, political opinions and the contents of the PRO-Trump. His engagement played a role in expanding her reach online.
Increased visibility translated and to income. Between October and November 2024 years, Fong export $ 11,286 earnings, $ 16,727 and $ 21,252.25 in three consecutive two-week periods through the X-Revenue Program. She publicly recognized the income and deserved the support platform.
As its audience has expanded, its content has used more political order. In October 2024. years, she announced Its support for Donald Trump in the upcoming elections. Musk responded to Emojis fire post, signaling visible approval.
In November 2024. Musk sent her a private message on X, asking if he would consider his child. After Fong discussed a message with a few more others, the musk reported, expressed dissatisfaction and is a nephew.
One month later, in December 2024. years Fong became an inconsequential controversy when the profile at Prostitution has appeared its publicly available Instagram photos.
She denied allegations, stating that the profile was false and did not have a connection to the site. However, it is still expanding to KS, which leads to renewed supervision and speculation of her credibility.
Musk was wrong at the platform at this time. Some users have connected their decision with false allegations, while others now suggest that this is an answer to the details of the Fong to the Fong Private message.
Since the report became public, Fong did not offer additional notes outside the confirmation independent that it was not a leak source and would have preferred to keep a thing privately.
Influence, incentives and centralized attention
The answer to X to the musk-fong episode is less focused on the behavior of celebrities and more about the nature of visibility on the platform ecosystems in the form of personal interactions.
One post directly sent an imbalance, stating that the musk “Djmifti Tiffani Fong to have his child, and then he cuts it when he said that he does not” badly affect the platform and benefit from the public influence.
Another user noted that very few creators in the footage of the Fong will create the same choice. Within the CRIPTO space, where many affected the vacancy on free Libertaria or right relying, association with musk often correlates with increased visibility and monetization.
One tweet was reading, “not a lot of girls, especially influence in crypto or right-wing space, it would not say that Mošutovo child.”
There were also discomfort about Mice’s form of expression for children with women who consider intelligent. While his position on the fall of the population was the public, the personal nature of his achievement to Fong and others before provoking the renewal issues.
Special post refers to what describes as “obsessiveness with multiple IVF babies”, it points out that it appears unusually in combination in combination with direct messages sent through the platform controlled.
From the crypt’s community, the episode also brings known tension to the surface. Although the industry promotes decentralization, most independent creators continues to relies on centralized platforms in which the engagement of shapes and exposure to algorithms often bind to a handful of influential accounts.
The Fong experience shows how it can be easily switched. Its reach did not affect the protocol changes or shifts of the network, changed when one account stopped dealing. For a space built on the resistant centralized power, which remains a non-release contradiction.
https://crypto.news/app/uploads/2025/04/crypto-7.png
2025-04-17 18:33:00