Purchase of voting on arbitruum Chases fears of management integrity gave

The latest case of purchasing voting on arbitrum raised serious concerns about the integrity of the Dao Management Model, potentially exhibit carriers significant risks.

Decentralized autonomous organizations promised to make the finance decentralizes and free. However, on Tuesday 8th April, the case of purchase Gave The voices revealed serious questions with the model. Namely, one individual spent 5 ETE to buy about 19.3 million in arbitrum (Arb) Voting power.

It was about $ 10,000 consumed to influence decisions involving about $ 6.5 million management, more than the voting power of the main delegates such as L2Beat and Wintermute. The user, known as Hitmonee.eth, used Lobbifi, platform, which allows token owners to monetize their power management.

In this case, the votes were used to support Cupojosephini’s seat candidature on an arbitrum surveillance and transparency transparency. The fact that the purchase of voting was used for the impact on the outcome of the Committee for Transparency has initiated serious concerns about the legitimacy and the security of the Gao administration.

According to Ignas from the pink brain, the supervisory role pays about $ 7,500 per month for 12 months. This suggests that the purchase of voting could be financially encouraged, not just ideologically guided. Wide, shows that the management structures gave using a model of one token-in one votes could be subject to manipulation.

Gave votes purchases of security risks

In July 2024. The compound gave a closely voice approved $ 24 millionor 5% cash register, on an external protocol. Namely, the protocol was controlled by one of the main holder companies that pushed the proposal. The move that came after two previous unsuccessful attempts, characterized by other members as a management attack.

The risk of platforms such as Lobbifi is that they can significantly reduce management attacks. Nefarious actors can now affect key decisions given to a fraction of money that will need differently. This allows them to get rich, at the price of the token owner and given.