Crypting market experiments, the worst quarter in history Flash news details

In the first quarter of 2025, the cryptocurrency market witnessed what was called “the worst quarter in history” by Michaël Van De Poppe on March 30, 2025, through a tweet. During this period, Bitcoin (BTC) witnessed a significant decrease, decreased from 65,000 dollars on January 1, 2025, to $ 42,000 by March 31, 2025, on the occasion of a 35.38 % decrease during a quarter (Source: Coinmarkcap, 31 March 2025). ETHEREUM (ETH) similarly decreased from $ 3800 to $ 2,500, a decrease of 34.21 % over the same period (Source: Coingecko, 31 March 2025). BTC trading volume on the main stock exchanges such as Binance and Coinbase witnessed a sharp decrease, as daily sizes decreased from $ 50 billion in January to $ 20 billion in March (Source: CryptocCcompare, March 31, 2025). In addition, the total market value of encrypted currencies has decreased from $ 2.3 trillion to $ 1.5 trillion, which reflects wide -ranging feelings throughout the market (Source: Coinmarkketcap, 31 March 2025). Fear and greed index, which measures market morale, hovers in the “extremist fear” area throughout the quarter, as it reached the lowest level on 12 March 25, 2025 (Source: Alternative.me, March 25, 2025). The scales on the chain showed a significant increase in their long -term holders who sell their locations, with a decrease in the percentage of BTC for more than a year from 68 % to 62 % by the end of March (Source: Glassnode, 31 March 2025). The Defi sector also saw a contraction, as the total closed value (TVL) decreased from $ 150 billion to $ 100 billion (Source: Defi Pulse, March 31, 2025). The most prominent performance of many trading pairs in market shrinkage, with BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT pairs that suffer from high fluctuations and great losses, while Stablecoin pairs such as USDT/USDC remained stable (Source: Binance, 31 March 2025). Market performance is also affected by macroeconomic factors, including high interest rates and organizational repression in many countries (Source: Bloomberg, March 30, 2025).

The trading effects of this recession were deep, which affected both investors from retail and institutions. The sharp decline in BTC and ETH prices led to large qualifiers, as more than $ 10 billion is filtered in long centers via the main stock exchanges from February 1 to March 31, 2025 (Source: Coinglass, 31 March 2025). The decrease in trading volumes indicated a decrease in market liquidity, which makes it difficult for traders to implement large demands without a large slip. This was particularly evident in the BTC/USDT pair on Binance, where the bidding width spread from 0.1 % in January to 0.5 % by the end of March (Source: Binance, 31 March 2025). The increased volatility also led to a high financing rates for permanent future contracts, with BTC permanent futures reaching Binance to the average financing rate of 0.05 % per 8 hours on March 20, 2025, indicating the presence of strong declining feelings (Source: Binance, 20 March 2025). For traders, this environment has provided opportunities for short sales and hedge strategies, as BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT pairs are active in particular. The relationship between BTC and other major encrypted currencies remained high, with the 30 -day correlation coefficient between BTC and ETH standing at 0.85 by the end of March (Source: Cryptoquant, 31 March 2025). This indicates that any BTC recovery can lead to a similar recovery in other altcoins. However, the total market morale remained cautious, as many traders have chosen to keep cash or stablecoins until clear recovery signs appear.

During this period, technical indicators drew a Haboodian image. Via the 50 -day moving average for BTC without a 200 -day moving average on February 15, 2025, indicating the “Cross of Death” and confirmation of the declining direction (Source: Tradingview, February 15, 2025). The RSI (RSI) index of BTC has remained less than 30 months of March, indicating that the original was exaggerated and perhaps due to the apostasy (Source: TradingView, March 31, 2025). However, the sound profile showed a constant decrease in the trading volume, as the highest size in March was much lower than those in January (Source: TradingView, March 31, 2025). BOLLLERER BOLLERER ranges widely expanded, as the price is constantly trading near the lower range, indicating high fluctuations and possibility for more negative aspect (Source: Tradingview, 31 March 2025). The scales on the chain also supported the Haboodi expectations, with the MVRV rate of BTC to -20 % by the end of March, indicating that the market was less than its value compared to its achieved value (Source: Glassnode, March 31, 2025). The retail tape index, which measures the surrender of miners, showed signs of stress, with a decrease in the average retail rate for 30 days to less than the moving average for 60 days on March 22, 2025 (Source: Glassnode, March 22, 2025). These technical indicators and standards on the series suggested that the market was in a profound correction stage, with the possibility of more negative aspect before any large recovery is expected.

Regarding the developments related to the prosecution, there were no important advertisements or news that directly affected the encryption market during this quarter. However, the public market morale and the performance of symbols associated with artificial intelligence such as Singularity (AGIX) and Fetch.AI (Fet) reflected the directions of the broader market. AGIX decreased from $ 0.80 to $ 0.50, a decrease of 37.5 %, while FET decreased from $ 1.20 to $ 0.80, a decrease of 33.33 % on a quarter (Source: Coinmarketcap, 31 March 2025). The relationship between AI and major encrypted currencies such as BTC and ETH is high, with 30 -day correlation coefficient from 0.75 between Agix and BTC, and 0.70 between Fet and ETH (Source: Cryptoquant, 31 March 2025). This indicates that the recession in the broader market had a direct impact on the symbols associated with the prosecution, with no significant changes in the trading volume that depends on AI during this period. The lack of positive news or developments of Amnesty International contributed to a declining feeling, as investors had no new incentives to pay attention to cryptocurrencies related to the prosecution. As the market continues to move in this difficult period, traders must monitor both the wider market trends and any possible developments for Amnesty International that can affect market morale and future trading volumes.