Case against Pavel Dur’s and why is it important for CRYPTO

6 hours ago

0 21 3 minutes read

Case against Pavel Dur's and why is it important for CRYPTO

The founder of Telegram Pavel Durov is allowed to temporarily leave France, but preliminary accusations against Him set significant questions for CRIPTO Community.

13. Marta, the French court gave the founder and executive director of Telegram for encrypted messages Permission to go to Dubaiwhere he previously resided. Durov was in France from August 2024. years, when he was Arrested at Le Bourget Airport in Paris.

Durov was part of an investigation containing list Nearby and complicity in crimes such as narcotics trade, money laundering, sexual exploitation of children and terrorism. Could face up to 20 years in prison if he was convicted.

Wide, Dur’s case asks questions about the responsibility of developers for cryptographic platforms and tools that create – a well-known question in the cryptocurnancy industry.

Is Dur’s responsible for what happens on the telegram?

Preliminary charges against Durov claim that it is responsible, at least partially, for illegal activities reportedly enabled by the encrypting platform and supporting cryptocurrency.

The argument will sound known for the observers for the crypto industry, which followed Case of Alexei PertsevaDeveloper Criptocurrenci Mixer services Tornado Cash. As with Dur’s, prosecutors claim that Pertsev is responsible for illegal activities that happened on the platform, namely money laundering.

Pertsev was arrested in the Netherlands in 2022 years and It’s on the bail right now While he is waiting for his trial to begin.

In both cases, members of Cripto Community recognized the possible implications for free speech and privacy and come to support managers.

Jose Faberega, head of Marketing on Blockey Methis based on Ethereum, called Durovov, arrested “Tornado money case again.”

Natalia Latka, Director of Public Policy and Regulatory Issues on ClockChain Analyzes the company Merkle Science, is previously told COINTELEGRAPH that “historical, software developers considered neutral creators of tools and platforms, responsible for their technical functionality, but not what those tools used.”

However, she said that it changed the proliferation of decentralized tools that “cause traditional regulatory frameworks”.

This puts decentralized platforms on the “narrow point”, Cripto Platform Onesafe wrote In the blog in place 17. Marta. “It means knowing the legal frameworks that regulate their business and deal with regulatory bodies.”

Durov also called the “Pivotal Moment” for the cryptocurstical industry and called on crypts firms to advocate for several “balanced regulations” and support groups of advocacy.

I’m wrote Dana 17. Marta The telegram “not only fulfilled, but exceeded its legal obligations”.

Implications to free speech

Observers and critics have equally asked concerns about Dur’s arrest – discussing what it means to freedom of speech and whether the arrest could be politically motivated.

Chris Pavlovski, General Manager of “Alt-Tech” Platform Rekeform River, said it was the final straw for him and his company that had previously had conflicted With French officials on censorship issues.

Gregori Alburov, investigator for combating corruption late Russian opposition politician Alexei Navalniki, said The case “In addition to being unfair as hell (Durov is obviously not engaged in terrorism or arms trade), it is also a huge burst of freedom of speech.”

Dur’s previous conflicts with regulators, especially in 2018., when he refused to comply with the order of Russian telecommunications regulators of the Rosador, have led many to believe that charges are politically motivated.

While French President Mannuel Macron Javno listed If the case was not attack on Durov, Dmitry Zaire-Bek – a Human Rights Lawyer and the Head of the Department for Human Rights Organization – disagrees.

“Durov is essentially aimed at protecting users to protect users and, of course, for his refusal cooperation with intelligence agencies”, he said.

Regardless of motivation, the outcome of the case will have clear implications for future platforms. The condemnation could intimidate platforms and executives in more intensively moderation to the point of censorship, while victory could make others more difficult to give up obligations to regulators and public security.

Durov’s absence in Dubai allegedly stretched at 7. April. The French prosecutor’s office did not give any public statements regarding the status of the case.

Journal: Cripto fans are obsessed with long-term and biohacking: Here’s why