Blockchain to purchase an election safety bill in New York

For the fifth consecutive legislative period in New York, State Council member Clyde Vanil presented invoice This would order the state to study whether the use of the professor’s book technique, known as Blockchain, can “protect” voter records and election results.

Identical bills were presented in the sessions dating back to 2017 did not find traction. Although the legislation calls only to study the potential use of technology, by recruiting the first experts in Blockchain technology, fraud on voters, cyber security, voter records and election results, and receiving these technologies in 2025 are still at best.

Mark Lingman, director of policy and strategy in the non -profit vote, said he is not sure of the problem of elections that Blockchain can solve, a technique famous for providing encrypted currencies like Bitcoin.

“For the vast majority of us, who do not live in the world of bitcoin and do not want to do so, it is really difficult to imagine a position in which I can feel improving on the election results knowing that they are on the LEDger notebook distributed somewhere.”

Vanil, an intellectual and democratic lawyer was not immediately available for an interview, In 2019 he said I think governments should not neglect cryptocurrency or Blockchain technology. He referred to the 2016 New York City Elections scandal where 117,000 voters in Brooklyn were incorrectly cleared of voter lists, an incident that he could have been avoided if the board of directors was using a notable public notebook like those presented by Blockchain.

Voters, especially Trump supporters, have become more cautious than the election results in recent years.

Pio Research Center Last year poll Donald Trump’s supporters and Kamala Harris supporters to find flagrant differences in their beliefs on how to hold elections. Trump supporters have been less likely to believe that people who are not qualified to vote would be prevented from voting or reporting a sense of confidence that after the elections ended, it would be clear which candidate he won.

Lindmann said that there have long been fears of Republicans and Democrats about the integrity of the election results, smartly about controversy in 2004 when some supporters of John Kerry claimed that some votes had been cleared.

He pointed out that the best source of election results are boycott or government sites, but these numbers are only reports on what the number of polls show.

“The earthly truth lives first and foremost with the paper polling cards that were voted on, then with the documents produced by election officials in the context of ratifying the results,” said Linddman. “The entire certificates process on a sacred group of election results appears out of the point for me.”

The pursuit of the non -change and spindle registry remains a confusing vote for many, and at least dozens of countries around the world, from Brazil to Estonia, have tried to use Blockchain for major events such as the national voting elections internally on politics changes. The Blockchain -backed mobile voting application used in the United States to collect live voters in some states in some states in some states was ultimately. It was found in 2020 It contains severe security weaknesses before discussions of the broader application.

One research paper 2020 The Cyberson Security Magazine at Oxford University confirmed that the Internet -based vote and cookhine “will significantly increase the risk of failures in uncovered elections,”.

Josh Greenpom, chief technology official at the American Non -profit voting institution He wrote in an opinion article This Blockchain technology “is very risky and harmful to a set of dangerous cybersecurity attacks”, but also distracting more constructive talks on how to improve security in the current model.

Lukv Fott, Georgia, last November It became the first boycott In the United States to use Blocchain from the Bitcoin platform to record election results. The boycott government used technology from starting operation in Georgia Simple guideWhich also supported the elections In Guatemala Williamson County, Tennessee, Republican Party agreement.

“Our solution is very useful to consolidate data on a specific point on time using Bitcoin Blockchain, but people do not vote on Blockchain using a simple guide,” said Rafael Cordon’s founder.

Cordon, the province in southeastern Georgia with about 14,000 population, said naturally, before the provincial election official used a USB engine to transfer a digital report created by voting machines on a computer not connected to the Internet.

He said: “This computer replaces the results, then the timelines for the election supervisor, this final report using a simple guide.” “Then they register to enter the system of reporting the Foreign Minister Night elections and downloading the results. So what they did is to protect that information on that specified point in the future or in the direction of the river course in the data collection process, they can prove that their information has not changed.”

Cordon said there is an appetite between some states of the states and provinces, including in Wyoming, to add layers of proof to the election results. But he said that his work is now converting his focus into public records and federal government, especially after Trump announced his interest in Blockchain and “Digital Asset Strategy” This includes bitcoin storage.