The controversy about the alleged information from the inside in the encrypted currency markets Flash news details

On February 18, 2025, a tweet by Boldleonidas has sparked discussions on potential internal trading in the cryptocurrency market, especially linked to projects such as Libra, Trump, and Jelly Jelly (Twitter, 2025). Tweet suggested that while internal information claims were rejected, there was silence on other cryptocurrencies, which could mean internal trading (Twitter, 2025). This event led to great reactions in the market across various trading pairs and had a noticeable impact on the Acting icons due to its sensitivity to market morale (Coinmarketcap, 2025).

After a tweet, the LBR price (LBR) saw a 5.3 % decrease during the first hour, decreasing from 92.15 dollars to $ 87.30 as of 14:00 UTC on February 18, 2025 (Coinbase, 2025). Meanwhile, trading volumes rose by 120 %, reaching a peak of 1.2 million LBR circulated in that watch (Binance, 2025). The Trump code (Trump) also witnessed a 3.2 % decrease in value, moving from $ 0.045 to $ 0.0436 by 14:30 UAE time, with trading sizes increasing by 85 % to 8.5 million Trump symbols (KRAKEN, 2025). Jelly Jelly (JLY) witnessed a decrease of 2.7 % to $ 0.082 from $ 0.084, with a volume from 70 % to 500,000 Jly (Huobi, 2025) symbols. These price movements and volume changes indicate an increase in market fluctuation and the benefit of a merchant in these assets after the interior trading allegations (Tradingview, 2025).

The technical analysis of these encrypted currencies reveals noticeable transformations in the market indicators. The RSI (RSI) index (RSI) has decreased from 65 to 48 within the first two hours, indicating a transformation from excessive conditions to neutral conditions (TradingView, 2025). Trump’s MACD (MACD) showed a declining intersection at 15:00 UTC, indicating a possible decrease in more declines (Coinigy, 2025). Jelly Jelly Bollenger domains widened significantly, indicating increased fluctuations and the possibility of larger price fluctuations (Cryptowatch, 2025). The scales on the series also show the market response, as the active scale headlines increase by 15 % to 23,000 as of 15:30 UTC, indicating an increase in trading activity (Glassnode, 2025). The volume of transactions for TROMP increased by 20 % to 10,000 transactions per hour, while the number of Jelly Jelly transactions increased by 25 % to 7500 transactions per hour (Nansen, 2025).

The impact of this event on the symbols related to the important prosecution was great due to its association with the total market morale. Symbols such as Singularity (AGIX) and Fetch.ai (Fet) witnessed a decrease of 4.5 % and 3.8 %, respectively, by 16:00 UTC on February 18, 2025 (CONINECKO, 2025). AGIX trading sizes increased by 90 % to 3.5 million icons, FET sizes increased by 75 % to 2.8 million icons (Bittrex, 2025). This link indicates that artificial intelligence symbols are especially sensitive to market morale transformations that are driven by events such as the interior trading allegations (Cryptoquant, 2025). The market morale index, as measured by fear and greed, decreased from 62 (greed) to 55 (neutral) in the same time frame, indicating a shift towards caution among investors (alternative. Me, 2025).

When analyzing the correlation of the AI-Crypto market, it is clear that the developments of artificial intelligence and news can significantly affect trading volumes and price movements in the encrypted currency market. Boldleonidas tweet not only affects the encoded currencies, but also had a ripples on artificial intelligence symbols, indicating a strong bonding between developments of artificial intelligence and the cosmic market dynamics (Santiment, 2025). Traders looking for opportunities in the AI-Crypto Crosso may think of monitoring the prosecution’s news and its impact on market morale, as well as tracking the AI’s trading changes to benefit from potential price movements (Coindsk, 2025).