“Bitcoin Standard” The author supports Dev financing to make Bitcoin unwanted messages expensive

The economists and authors of The Bitcoin Standard, Saifedean Ammous, have created the continuous debate about random mail inscriptions on Bitcoin, indicating that he “throws in a few Sats” to finance a full -time developer focusing on making Bitcoin Spamming more difficult and costly.

Ammous made statements in response to a thread started by the GrasFidbitcoin, which called for Bitcoin Core to integrate the request for withdrawal No. 28408, which will enable the knot operators to liquidate the inscriptions more easily.

According to GrassFedbitcoin, the lack of inscription filtering tools contributes to the unnecessary intifada and undermines Bitcoin (BTC) The role of a critical protocol.

“No one runs a knot that wants to deport the inscriptions,” he booksOn the pretext that the maximum OP_RUTURN was justified in the past under wrong assumptions. It has paid a virtual formal policy that encourages Bitcoin’s use to store JPEGS instead of cash data.

The CEO of Blockstream Adam Back challenged the proposal, describing the liquidation of the engraving as a “arms race”. He pointed out that the random mail data contained in bitcoin transactions can be modified indefinitely using code structures, which requires fixed updates to liquidate tools.

Related to: Ordinals bitcoin vs. Ethereum Nfts: Comparative Overview

Ammous compares random bitcoin to email

Ammous compare the issue of Bitcoin RAM to the email – the other armament race in the fighting is still without giving up the system.

“This is not an easy thing, but it is worth trying to help bankruptcy faster,” Ames said. He said that RAM is not censorship, noting that the knots operators are already rejecting invalid transactions.

He added: “Therefore, the hostility of the knot, which is looking to remove unwanted messages,” is no less healthy than unwanted messages. “

The discussion was a comment from other users. One of the participants has suggested that the main developers be treated by employees who guide the random mail in some startups as “engineers who are not interested in guaranteeing quality”, and simply canceling every trick they spread.

Ammous took more, and suggested “neglecting” the work of developers who build random mail tools and even employ external programmers to overcome their systems.

The conversation reflects the ongoing tensions in the Bitcoin community about the intended use of the network. As the inscriptions continue to congestion, the calls for technical anti -measures – and pointed criticism of those who defend random mail – are increasing with a louder voice.

In the February 4 report, Mimpol Research said Adoption of inscriptions Bitcoin can lead The average mass size is 4 MB (MB) For each block, much higher than the current averages.

The average Bitcoin block – the amount of data in each block posted on the general professor’s book – is currently about 1.5 MB.

magazine: Arthur Hayes $ 1M Bitcoin Tip, Altcoins’ Rally Rallly “Loom: Hodler’s Digest, 11-17 May