Former CEO CEONBASE Germany joins lukso to accelerate to speed up adoption online

Web3 can give more power to network creators, allowing them to experiment without fear of engrossing, says the new Luxo Coo.

The editor’s note: Fabian Vogelsteller, co-founder of Lukso provided some of the answers in the lower and lower side.

Creators have long been at the mercy of current network platform, such as Google, Meta and Spotifications. These platforms may change the rules, however, they consider appropriate, which affects the range of creators and earnings. Lux (Figure) Is one of the companies that hopes to use Web3 to give more power to creators.

The company has recently announced the appointment of Jan-Oliver sales as a new main Operational Officer. Sales, former Director General in Covanica Germany, and Fabian Voelsteller, co-founder Lukso shared its insights on the potential of Web3 for Cripto.News.

Cripto.News: AI has enabled many more people to become creators. However, there are many creators who are concerned about the ascent of AI and what it means for them. How does it fit into Luxury’s vision of empowering creators?

Jan-Oliver Sale: AI has reshaped creativity, but also asks questions about authorship, attribution and responsibilities. The focus with Lukso is for providing and systems a check-in presence on the universal profiles chain.

The universal profile is not only for people; It can also serve as a digital identity for AI agents. This allows the AI ​​to act on chain transparent transactions, publish content, holding property and interaction with other profiles – all under persistent, verified identity. The universal profile can be connected to outside the chain sources of training data, the reference models that is trained and is the actions of the diary for responsibility.

What matters, universal profiles are programmable and modular. Multiple people – such as developers, curators or security auditors – can be granted permission to manage AI profile via LSP6 Cite Manager standards. This allows for a safe, cooperation monitoring and agents. The profile can even make the following, earn reputation and develops socially – just like human creating.

CN: How does Luxury deals with intellectual property rights and how it fits into existing IP law?

JS: Lux is not a fixed system with a set of functionality, but as well as Etherum sand for unlimited ways to solve things. As well as intellectual property, which can be transparently managed by technology. Instead of replacing legal systems, the focus is on improving creators that allow you to fasten permissions, metadata and confirmation directly digital assets. This allows clearer, trail or legal strips resistant to a fraud, helping the bridge with the traditional IP institution with the evolved digital landscape.

CN: Lux is promoted as a block to create an economy. Can you draw problems with centralized platforms like Instagram or Spotify for Creators?

JS: Centralized platforms are closed systems. They control who sees what, as creators earn and what characteristics are allowed. Creators are at the mercy of movement of algorithms, opaque policies and data silos they do not possess or control.

With Lux and LSP standards of Smart Contract, especially universal profiles, the focus is on switching that power of dynamics. Universal profiles are fully on chain, resistant to censorship and publicly available. This means that creators have their own identity and content, and everyone can read or communicate with these data fans, applications, platforms or even new protocols. No one can turn off or shadow-prohibit profile. Once published, it is part of the common, permit space.

This open basis provides completely new types of relationships between creators, communities and developers. Fans can build tools on top of creative profiles. The artists can freely experiment without fear of rejection. And the new protocols can cause to treat creators as sovereign participants, not just content suppliers. It is a better environment for innovation, freedom and sustainable relationship.

CN: What are the benefits of Web3 platform compared to centralized platforms? What are some challenges with which the Web3 is facing?

JS: Web3 introduces transparency, ownership and user agency. It allows creators to be mounted directly, have their audiences and act without the platform goalkeeper. However, in the main adoption, it retains complex-unknown tools, confusing interfaces and security issues. That is why I solved him by reviewing user accounts with fundamental profiles – the adoption of smart, recoverable and user baked identities Web3 experience.

What has Web3 Back is not tool and DAPPS, but based, cleans the private key order and lack of a suitable standardized account system based on the contract. This is now resolved and available for all Web3 through Suggestions for standards Luxury (LSPS).

CN: Despite the benefits of decentralization, we have seen that centralized subjects are consistently popped up in the Blocko-Space. For example, CEX and Memecoin launches, popular for their availability. Can decentralized platforms ever close accessibility gap?

JS: Decentralized systems are often faced with obstacles, speed and user experience. These restrictions have led to the increase in centralized intermediaries even within the Web3 – because they are offered on facilitates and speeds of people. But with the right standards, that gap is not close – it becomes an opportunity to jump.

We restore a layer of user experience using universal profiles and new standards that make blockchain accounts smart, recoverable and expandable. This transforms the user interface Web3 into some more intuitive and more powerful than Web2.

What really sets is the composibility. In Web2, applications and platforms are sunshine – you cannot take Instagram and connect it to Spotify. You can install protocols directly in the profiles in LUKSE Ecosystem. One mini-app can serve as a token launchpad, an event ticket or fan search tool. When installed in a universal profile in you Universaleverithing.ioThe profile itself becomes an application: the artist profile becomes their ticket shop, the project profile becomes their LannerPad. This level of modularity and cross-functionality does not exist in Web2.

Proper standards, decentralization cannot suit the convenience of centralized platforms – it can be exceeded by offering more flexibility, ownership and creative potential.

CN: What are the key areas that luxers focus on help creators?

JS: The focus with Lukso is on the construction of digital infrastructure creators need – where the identity, ownership and creativity are deeply integrated into the block itself.

Key areas include:

• Universal profiles: Smart chain orders that serve as a digital identity of the creator. They keep property, reputation and permits – allow creators to build trust, history and interaction over any platform.
• Token standards (LSP7 for buttons, LSP8 for NFTS): These standards exceed the legacy such as ERC20 or ERC721, allowing automation, real-time reactions and seamless integration with profiles and applications.
• Universaleverithing.io: Open, the composed side where creators and developers can explore the ecosystem, build mines and create new experiences for their fans. It is like a living command board for decentralized web where the profile is not just presence, but a programmable space.

Together, these components form a foundation in which creators are not locked on platforms – they possess their identity, data and audience and they can increase their ecosystem by their own conditions.