Taraxa co -founder pushes Blockchain transparent standards

The scales used to measure the results can be misleading when evaluating the Blockchain performance. With more Blockchain networks, the audience needs clear efficiency standards, rather than exaggerated claims, to distinguish between them.

In a conversation with Beincrypto, the founder of Taraxa Stephen Po explained that it is increasingly difficult to compare Blockchain precisely because many of the amounts reported depend on excessive optimistic assumptions instead of evidence -based results. To combat this wave of distortion, PU suggests a new scale, calling it TPS/$.

Why does the industry lack reliable criteria?

The need for clear distinction increases with the number increasing Layer-1 Blockchain Networks. Since many developers promote their Blockchains, dependence on the standards that distinguish their performance becomes indispensable.

However, the industry still lacks reliable criteria for real world efficiency, rather than relying on it Intermittent emotional waves of popularity driven by noise. According to the PU, the markets are currently satisfied with the market, which blocks the real capabilities.

“It is easy for opportunists to benefit by increasing exaggeration and exaggeration to profit themselves. Every technical concept that can be perceived and scale at one time or another has been used to bother many projects that are not really worth it: TPS, time arrival time, unity, network node Count, speed, parallel, use of the frequency range, EVM compatibility, EVM correspondingAnd so on, “Bo BEINCRYPTO said.

PU focused on how to use some TPS measures, using marketing tactics to make Blockcha performance look more attractive than it may be under the real world conditions.

TPS misleading nature examination

Cropherater transactions, more known as TPS, is a scale indicating the average or A continuous number of transactions Blockchain can process and end in a second under regular operating conditions.

However, it is often misleading projects, providing a perverted performance of public performance.

“Decentralization networks are complex systems that need to be considered as a whole, and in the context of their use cases. But the market has this terrible habit of simplifying and excessive sale in the scale or a specific aspect, while ignoring everything.

PU notes that Blockchain projects with extremist claims on one standards such as TPS may have been subjected to decentralized danger, protectionAnd accuracy.

“Take TPS, for example. This scale is one reduces many other aspects of the network, for example, how was TPS achieved? Transactions, then you can get “TPS” in billions.

Taraxa co -founder revealed the extent of these enlarged scales in a recent report.

The great contradiction between TPS theoretical and realism

PU sought to demonstrate his point of view by defining the difference between the maximum historical TPS on Mainnet’s Blockchain and the maximum theoretical TPS.

Of the 22 minaret networks and one network observed, I found, on average, there was a 20 times the gap between theory and reality. In other words, the theoretical scale was 20 times higher than the maximum of Mainnet Tps.

“Exaggeration in metric estimates (as in the case of TPS) is a response to the very speculative encryption market and novels. Everyone wants to put their project and their technologies in the best possible light, so that they reach theoretical estimates, or to make largely unrealistic tests, to reach enlarged standards. They are self -ads. Nothing is less than anything.

He looks forward to facing these exaggerated standards, PU developed his performance scale.

Submit TPS/$: A more balanced scale?

PU and his team developed the following: TPS has been achieved at the cost of Mainnet / Monthly $ for a single auditor, or TPS / $ for a short period, to meet the need for better performance standards.

This scale evaluates performance based on the verified TPS on Mainnet Live for the network with also thinking about devices efficiency.

The large gap of 20 times was persuaded between the theoretical and actual productivity of PU to exclude the existing standards only on the assumptions or laboratory conditions. It was also aimed at clarifying how some people Blockchain projects Performance scales by relying on costly infrastructure.

“The demands of the publication of the published network are often amplified with very expensive devices. This is especially true for networks with very central consensus mechanisms, as the bottleneck of the productive bottle turns away from the network of network communication and to the performance of one automatic devices. Their prices,” Poe explained.

The PU team has determined the requirements of the minimum devices for each network to determine the cost of each scrutiny. They later appreciated their monthly cost, while paying special attention to their relative limitation when using TPS for each dollar ratio.

“Therefore, the TPS/$ scale is trying to correct two of the most terrible groups of wrong information, by forcing the TPS performance to be on Mainnet, and detecting the bounds inherent in the devices very expensive.”

PU stressed the consideration of two simple characteristics that can be determined: whether the network is inexpensive and unique.

Permission for permission: What enhances decentralization?

The degree of security in Blockchain can be unveiled if it operates under or without a square network.

Blockchains centenary Return to closed networks where access and sharing are limited to a pre -defined set of users, which requires permission from a central salad or a reliable group to join. In Blockchains without permission, anyone is allowed to participate.

According to PU, the previous model contradicts the philosophy of decentralization.

“The network that has been declared, where health verification membership in the network is controlled by one entity, or if there is only one entity (each layer 2s), is another excellent scale. This tells you whether the network is decentralized or not.

Attention to these standards will prove vital over time, as networks with central authorities tend to be more vulnerable to some weaknesses.

“In the long run, what we really need is a battery of the uniform attack tankers of the L1 infrastructure that can help detect weaknesses and barters of any specific architectural design. Many problems in the current L1 current are to give up unreasonable sacrifices, and the inconveniences that disturb them, which increases the sacrifices that bother them.

Meanwhile, understanding whether the network employs the process of forming the state in exchange for maintaining one case, revealing the unification of its data management.

State driver in exchange for individual condition: Understanding the data unit

In Blockchain’s performance, cumin indicates the time delay between providing the network, and its confirmation, including in a block on Blockchain. It measures the time it takes to process the transaction and becomes a permanent part of the distributor’s book.

Determining whether the network employs government fame or can reveal one case of participating in cumin efficiency.

The state -specific networks divide Blockchain data into multiple independent parts called fragments. Each cat works somewhat independently and does not have direct access in the actual time to the full state of the entire network.

On the contrary, the non -excellent network has one common case across the entire network. All contract can access the same full data set in this case.

PU noted that the state -specific networks aim to do so Increase storage capacity and transactions. However, they often face longer time because of the need to process transactions through multiple independent fragments.

He added that many of the projects that adopt an evaluation approach to exaggerate productivity as soon as its network is repeated instead of building an integrated and truly development structure.

“The specified network of the country that does not subscribe to a state, is simply making non -connected copies of the network. If you take the L1 network and only make 1,000 copies independently of it, it is clear that it is not faithful to invite that I can add all productivity via productivity together, but it represents it as only one network. Independent copies,” Pu said.

Based on his research in Blockchain’s efficiencyPU highlighted the need for basic transformations in how to evaluate, finance and successful projects.

What are the basic transformations that Blockcha evaluation needs?

PU visions offer a noticeable alternative to Blockchain Satellite Class 1, where misleading performance standards are increasingly competing for attention. Reliable and effective standards are necessary to counter this wrong representation.

“You only know what you can measure, and at the present time in encryption, the numbers look like noise columns more than objective measurements. The presence of uniform and transparent measurements that provide simple comparisons through the products options, so that developers and users understand what they use, and what are the barters they are doing. This is the distinctive feature of any comfortable industry, and we still have a long way to go to encryption.”

The adoption of uniform and transparent standards will enhance the process of making enlightened decisions and achieving real progress that goes beyond mere promotional claims with the maturity of the industry.