The encryption market forgery? Exchanging the explosions of the founding of the challenge to manipulate the price

The founder of the leading digital investment company in digital assets raised great concerns about the reliability of the pricing of the distinctive code for encryption, noting that the manufacturers of market and central exchanges (CEXS).

Arthur Chiong, CEO of Defiance Capital, I mentioned The social media platform X has expressed that the encryption market is suffering from a lack of transparency, with artificial sustainable prices that constitute serious risks to investors.

Objects to manipulate the encryption market

According to Cheong, coordination between encryption projects and market makers created the “BlackBox” scenario where external observers, including retail investors and institutions, struggle to determine whether the distinctive code prices reflect the real supply and demand or the product of treated mechanisms.

Cheung confirmed that such practices are threatening to undermine the market confidence and can be made in the end Expand a wider encryption market “Investable.”

In his statement, Cheung criticized the central exchanges to overcome the problem, indicating that Non -scrutinized behavior Confidence is eroded by Altcoin Market.

The biggest problem with the liquid encryption market is now the full BlackBox box for how to work projects and market makers together to create an artificial price that can last for a very long time.

You don’t know if the price is the result of organic order and supply …

Arthur (@arthur_0x) April 14, 2025

High The direction of symbols It was launched through the events of the distinguished symbol (TGES) rapidly lost value. In many cases, the newly listed distinctive symbols decreased by 70 % to 90 % within a few months of their initial launch. Notice Chiong:

If adult players in the industry are not escalating to improve this, a large part of the market will remain invested in the foreseeable future.

Community response

Support Cheong notes, Miles Deutscher’s sharing Data This indicates that 3 out of 27 code codes listed in Binance this year managed to maintain positive prices.

The remaining 88 % witnessed significant decreases, with losses ranging from 19 % to 90 %. Deutscher pointed to this trend as a contributing factor in the decrease in participation Retail investors.

This data, including Cheong, has sparked interesting reactions from the encryption community. He invited some users Binance And other exchanges to do the right thing and “request more transparency and disclosure” from projects before listing.

CEXS should demand more transparency and disclosure before inserting things. Hey Binance Coinbase Perhaps it is the crime Szn with Trump. But the party will expire sooner or later, and in the European Union it will become more striking, so it may start self -control. You give the industry a bad name.

– xkix – E/ACC (Zack) (@0x_zak) April 14, 2025

At the same time, the other side of society’s reactions believes that most cryptocurrencies have no value from the beginning, but with support for initial ascension speculation, they are sentenced to failure in the end. X User known as Kun books:

It is not a problem because if it is worth it, then you buy it if the value of the coding code depends on the price that does not invest, but speculation is only most of the symbols have no value in their nature and people do not know why they possess anything.

Distinguished image created by Dall-E, the tradingview chart