The future of the US Enforcement Crypt
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4cc5/b4cc5dc0986e494912cfba6c5f222c80210edc65" alt="The future of the US Enforcement Crypt 1 The future of the US Enforcement Crypt"
Serving as the first head SEC’S CRIPTO unit since 2017. until 2019. years, I often ask me what crypto implementation should we expect to see from the new administration. My first answer is I don’t know. My second answer is to believe it will be different, but it will not disappear.
In order to anticipate the future of crypt’s application, we should start reviewing the past.
Start
SECs CRIPTO implementation unit was formed in 2017 during the first Trump administration. Early focus was on one, deceit and two, basic events for raising capital. Regulation of capital collection is the main purpose of the law on securities in 1933. When the investor gives the money to the entrepreneur who will use it to generate a profit, the investor has the right to certain information on certain information on certain information. The early investigations of the crypto were directed to this activity collection, which was usually in the form of unregistered initial bids of coins (“ICO”). The idea was that many ICOs were not so different at the time, in essence of the capital or offer of debt and should be regulated similarly.
The industry responded responsibly and now, Cripto entrepreneurs often collect money in accordance with the federal laws of securities. In one of several options, some offers are exempt from SEC registration because they are limited to accredited investors. Entrepreneurs then use the capital to build a blockchain protocol or other crypto products. Once built, token sales are probably not an offer of securities because people do not buy tokens as investments in one’s business. Even if there is hope for profit, it will get profit from customers’ activities and other participants, not the efforts of the central business manager.
The last four years
During the last four years, SEC focused on its executive activities in middle markets, such as centralized trade platform and decentralized protocols. It is less clear how the laws of federal securities refer to these markets. These transactions generally do not include a central entrepreneur who collect money from investors and using it in business. Instead, there are thousands or even millions of crypt participants who are interacting interacts, sometimes anonymously through autonomous software. Token customers may not know who sold them tokens and cannot be crucial for future influence. Federal district courts have reached different conclusions and there are reports that the sec could drop one of these key cases.
Wider, implementation has become the dominant focus of SEC regulations. The sec has doubled the size of the CRIPTO unit, creating new positions of supervisory and court lawyers. He spent years and a huge amount of resources with a couple of cases of not fraud. Many additional lawyers of non-units worked on crypto research, and criede seemed to be the CRIPTO main focus of Sececution Security.
This approach has not created useful guidelines in the industry. Many sectic programs have technical aspects that are incompatible with an anonymous decentralized book that is blockchain technology. According to a host approach in recent years, a very premise of technology was not treated as a function, but as a mistake. The result was an existential executive risk of growing industry and economic activity that was pushed on Shore.
Futurity
I don’t believe the crypto industry wants wild west without a regulation. They want a reasonable rulebook that makes compliance feasible, and also want to be regulators to reject on deception. There are no legitimate actors to transfer in the industry.
What does that mean for the next four years of execution?
First, implementation is only one component of regulation. We are likely to see increased resources dedicated to other parts of effective regulation – new guidelines and rules that offer an achievable regulatory framework. Chairman of the acting SEC Mark Uyeda recently announced a New Working Group for Crypto for the development of a “reasonable regulatory time” and Commissioner Hester Peirce, who will lead the workgroup, Included in its goals “Preservation (ing) The ability of industry to offer products and services.” The dedicated crypto unit has also been reduced in size and is rejected into technologies with cyber and emerging, with many staff returning to general executive duties.
Secondly, we could see the renovated focus on fighting fraud. The Commission has not stopped encrypting cases in the last four years, but many cases of titles have not exceeded regulatory disputes. It could change; As Commissioner Peirce said in his speech goals, “we can’t stand liars, cheaters and fraud.”
Third, once there is a new rulebook, we can expect SEC to implement these rules. That will take. We could see a transition period, with some cases, no more fraud, but more focusing on writing a new rulebook. Once adopted, the application of that Ordinance could be reached after a fair period of dismissal to adjust the industry.
Conclusion
I expect the CRIPTO SEC CRYPTO executors continued, but with different priorities. Investor protection will be balanced with the co-establishment of the SEC mandate facilitating capital formation and maintaining the order of order. The crippto industry is filled with good actors who want to be in line; They just need a rulebook achieving compliance. The restored approach will allow the industry to grow without leaving investor protection.
SEC has so far been the most highest regulator crypto, but it is not alone. Other federal agencies can occur as co-equal regulatory leaders, either legislation or otherwise, especially if the SEC does not take on the view that each cryptocurrency (except Bitcoin) is provided. Some state authorities are active in the CRIPTO, and that is likely to continue or even increase.
The client recently reminded me that there would be another election in four years. The new regulatory approach and decisions on business and products in industry must be durable. If not, the renewed access to the cryptou in the next four years could be undone as easily as the last four years.
https://cdn.sanity.io/images/s3y3vcno/production/3fe787d122542a4530eee7f8a566b19d7169d30e-1500×1000.jpg?auto=format
2025-02-26 18:53:00