Is it possible to change the maximum solid limit for Bitcoin of 21 million? – Tradingvief news

What is the maximum?

The steel cover is the maximum supply of cryptocurrency that can be found at all. It is coded in the Blockchain code and determines a blatant limit on the number of symbols or coins that can be created. This limit enhances scarcity, which can help enhance the value of each symbol over time.

Take bitcoin btcusdFor example. Its originator, Satoshi Nakamoto, put a solid cover of 21 million coins. Regardless of the amount of demand there or a number of miners trying to produce a new Bitcoin, the offer will not exceed 21 million.

Why is the hard cover important?

The absolute scarcity is a big deal of encryption. It is like Bitcoin being digital gold, but more limited. If the demand increases, the price may rise because new coins cannot be created to meet this demand. The only way the cryptocurrency can increase by changing its primary symbol – mainly re -invention.

Compare this with gold: If it is easier for everyone to get gold suddenly, the width will increase, and the price will decrease. Bitcoin does not have this problem due to the fixed maximum.

Steel cover versus soft cover in ICOS

The term “Cap Hard Cap” also appears in the world of raw currency shows (ICOS). When projects collect funds through ICOS, the maximum amount is the amount aimed at collecting, while the smooth maximum is the minimum necessary to launch the project.

Think of the soft cover as the minimum donation collection, while the solid cover is a stretch goal. The solid cover is usually adjusted to allow more donation collection capabilities, but this does not always mean that the project will reach this goal.

Either way – whether talking about the total boundaries of the display or the collection of donations – the maximum solid limit helps in setting clear boundaries, enhancing transparency and scarcity.

Now, let’s explore the 21 million bitcoin cap-why is it very important and what can happen if this cap is changed.

The importance of the maximum solid bitcoin 21 million

The 21 million Bitcoin cover guarantees its scarcity, as it works as a digital gold and a valuable store, but continuous discussions wonder if it can be changed.

The maximum solid limit of Bitcoin is similar to 21 million coins of DNA, which makes Bitcoin dear origins today. It is the digital equivalent of gold scarcity, and this is a great reason that makes people see as a valuable store. Bitcoin is also APEX assets in the category of encrypted currency assets. But with bitcoin growth and development, some people began to ask: Can this difficult cover be changed at all?

Let’s divide it and see why this is a hot topic.

Imagine if someone suddenly decided to print more gold. It will not be precious anymore, right?

It is the primary economy between supply and demand. As the supply increases, the perceived value usually decreases, and vice versa.

The same applies to bitcoin. The maximum steel is 21 million in its symbol by Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious bitcoin creator. It gives Bitcoin its digital scarcity, which is a very rare feature in the world of currencies.

Even in the world of encrypted currencies, other origins do not enjoy blue chip like ETHER (ETH) and Solana (Sol) with the same position as Bitcoin regarding its economic model.

This is why this cover is a big deal.

• Value Store: Bitcoin is often called “digital gold” because, like gold, rare. There is only a lot of it, and no one can win more. This scarcity is a large part of its value.
• Decentralization and trust: Unlike the Fiat currencies, where central banks can print money whenever they want, Bitcoin supplies are fixed. This means that no one can tamper with him to make his own gains.
• A predictable monetary policy: Bitcoin supplies grows at a predictable rate, thanks to the half -event that occurs almost every four years. This event cuts the mining bonus in half, which slows down in the creation of a new BTC until the maximum of 21 million is reached.

As of 2025, more than 19.8 million BTC has already been extracted, leaving less than 1.2 million people to be created. This scarcity is a large part of the bitcoin value, as it currently hovering about $ 100,000 per coin.

Suggestions to change the maximum 21 million

While the maximum cost of 21 million points of bitcoin, previous discussions, from premature inflation to the wars of mass size for the year 2017, show how difficult it is to change the basic bitcoin rules.

While the maximum of 21 million is largely a gospel in the world of bitcoin, there have been a few whispers about changing it over the years. Let’s take a look at some of these discussions.

Again in the first days of Bitcoin, some people wondered whether the inflationary model may be necessary. The concern was that once all BTC was extracted, miners may lose incentive to secure the network.

But Satoshi Nakamoto had a solution: transaction fees. As the bonus bonuses decrease over time, the main incentive fees for workers will take over. This idea has held well so far.

Hull Feni, one of the oldest adopters in Bitcoin (and perhaps the first person to obtain Bitcoin from Satoshi), as soon as he thinks about the possibility of entering some inflation after reaching the maximum of 21 million. But it was clear that this is just an intellectual experience, not a serious proposal. In his words:

However, Vinnie remained a strong supporter of Bitcoin.

Although there is no display ceiling directly, the 2017 block size discussions showed how difficult it is to change the basic bitcoin bases. Society was deeply divided around whether the size of the mass will be increased, and the dispute ultimately led to a difficult thorn, creating Bitcoin. If there is a relatively small thing like the size of the mass can cause such a rift, imagine the chaos that will arise if someone tries to tamper with the maximum 21 million.

What will happen if the Bitcoin 21 million cover changes?

The changing CAP of Bitcoin 21 million will break confidence, feel panic in the market, and it is likely to lead to a difficult thorn, but history shows that society strongly protects its scarcity.

Some speculated in the encryption space that, with the growth of bitcoin adoption and mining bonuses, there can be pressure to insert a small inflating mechanism.

But to be real, this will try to rewrite the constitution of the largest encryption assets. The Bitcoin community is strongly protecting its principles, and any attempt to change the width cap is likely to face tremendous resistance.

But it is worth thinking about: What will happen if the difficult cover is changed?

Let’s play this scenario. What if someone has already tried to change the difficult Bitcoin cover? Alerting the spoiler: He will not go well.

• Loss of confidence and credibility: Bitcoin’s full value proposal was built on confidence. If the width cap is changed, that confidence will be destroyed. As the investor and the author Nassim Talib once said: “Bitcoin is the beginning of a wonderful thing: a currency without a government, something necessary and necessary.” Tampering with a difficult cover would undermine this greatness.
• Market reaction and price impact: Bitcoin price is closely related to its scarcity. If the width ceiling is increased, the market is likely to be panic. We can see a huge selling process as investors lose confidence in the value of Bitcoin. Remember that the price of bitcoin was historically driven by its fixed supply, and any change in it would be a seismic event.
• Difficult thorn and division network: If a proposal to change the traction of the traction is gained, it will surely lead to a difficult thorn. Society was divided into two camps: those who support change and those who did not do it. The result? Two competitors from Bitcoin. But history explains to us that the thorns like this rarely succeed. Just take a look at Bitcoin Cash; It still exists, but it is not anywhere close to the value or is widely approved like Bitcoin.
• Developer and Society Support: Bitcoin Core will need to get this idea. But these people resemble the principles of Bitcoin. They are unlikely to support something that undermines its basic value.
• Mine Agreement: Miners will also need to agree to change. But why are they? Miners have a firm interest in bitcoin value. Increased supply would reduce their property and reduce their long -term profits. There can be an argument that if the difficulty of mining decreases, in the process of increasing the width, which makes bitcoin mining effectively more economical. This can make miners more vigor and support for an increase in the ceiling of the width.
• The consensus of the knot: Even if the developers and miners agree, the majority of the knot operators will also need to enter. The contract is the backbone of the Bitcoin network, and they have the final statement of the changes approved by the perspective of governance.

Another possibility deserves to take into account the role of great institutional bitcoin holders such as Blackrock and strategy. If they see the benefits of increasing the width through a fork and they are ready to move the capital widely to the complex bitcoin, this may lead to a meaningful alternative to Bitcoin.

Even with Bitcoin Cash capital support, the acceptance of society is crucial for any complex chain to become a meaningful alternative to bitcoin. The hard Bitcoin cover is one of its most sacred principles, which its community is very guarded.

And Andreas Antonoboulos, a defender of the well -known bitcoin currencies, said:

Therefore, in theory, it is possible to change the steel bitcoin cover. After all, it is just a symbol, and code can be rewritten. But in practice? It is a completely different story. Changing the solid cover will undermine this movement and the confidence that has been built over the years.

Bitcoin cover 21 million is not just a number; It is a promise that the Bitcoin community intends to keep it. Therefore, although the idea of ​​changing the cover may make an interesting intellectual experience, it is unlikely to come out as a reliable alternative to Bitcoin. Bitcoin’s scarcity is here to survive, and this is a large part, which makes it very distinctive.